# Logo claim

> A social-proof band that argues as well as displays: a display-size claim and a short proof paragraph hold the wide side, and four client logos stack in a narrow ruled rail opposite. The rail is the only ruled thing in the section, so the marks read as the evidence for the sentence beside them rather than as decoration under it. Demonstration logos are included for replacement with your own marks, each contained in a fixed cell so no mark is cropped. States no colour and no font of its own.

Canonical: https://patternpaste.com/pattern/logo-claim.html
Section: Logos
Access: Included in Pattern Paste access.
Needs: Requires a block theme on WordPress 7.0 to 7.1. Classic themes and page builders are outside our supported setup. Adaptive patterns use the block theme’s colour, spacing and typography presets; styled variations declare their own colours or type.
Blocks: column, columns, group, heading, image, paragraph
Keywords: logos, clients, social proof, proof, credibility, partners

## Variations (3)

### Claim and rail (the default)

Identical markup in every theme.

The argument wide on the left, the marks in a closed rail on the right. Your base, your contrast, your typeface.

### Masthead

Identical markup in every theme.

The claim comes out of its column and runs the measure as a masthead, and the rail and the proof paragraph share the row beneath it, marks first. Louder opening, and the marks now sit level with the reading rather than beside the headline.

### Olive and mustard

This variation states its own colours and states its own type: identical in every theme.

As featured in, for a restaurant or venue: states deep olive, cream type and mustard details, with the press titles set as type in a ruled rail, an italic Didot claim over Helvetica.


---

## The signature moment: the evidence is ruled and the argument is not

There is exactly one rule in this pattern and it is drawn around the logos. The
claim, the proof paragraph and the footnote have no border, no plate and no
ground of their own; they are bare type on the band. The marks sit inside a rail
closed on all four sides with a hairline between each one.

That single asymmetry is what makes the section argue. A ruled box reads as a
record, a citation, a list of references, and putting one next to unruled
prose makes the prose read as a statement and the box read as its footnote.
Reverse it, or rule both halves, and the band collapses back into two columns of
stuff. Density contrast does the rest: one side is airy and set at three
different sizes, the other is a regular stack of identical cells.

The scale collision is deliberate too. The claim runs at up to 54px and the
labels either side of it at 15px, with nothing in between except the reading
paragraph. There is no mid-sized subheading anywhere, which is what keeps the
sentence loud in a section that is otherwise very quiet.

## How a mark of any proportion fits the cell

Real logo files arrive at wildly different proportions: a square monogram, a
long horizontal wordmark, a tall stacked lockup. So each image block sets
**`width: 100%`, a fixed `height` of `3.5rem`, and `scale: contain`**, which
WordPress serialises as `object-fit: contain; width: 100%; height: 3.5rem` on
the `<img>`.

The **box** is fixed, so all four marks occupy the same 56px band of height and
read as one set. The **mark** is never cropped: `contain` scales the whole file
until it fits inside that box and leaves the remainder empty, so a tall lockup
shrinks on height and a wide wordmark shrinks on width, and nothing is cut off
or stretched.

This is the opposite of the crop rule used everywhere else in the catalogue. A
photograph uses `scale: cover`, because it may be cropped and must fill its
frame. A logo may not be cropped and must not fill its frame: the space around a
mark is part of the mark. The one thing to watch is a file with a lot of
built-in transparent padding, which will look smaller than its neighbours
because `contain` fits the file and not the ink inside it. Trim the file rather
than raising the height on one cell.

## What it inherits from your theme

- **Palette.** The ground is your `base` and every piece of type is your
  `contrast`, each a fallback chain ending on a colour WordPress itself
  guarantees. No accent anywhere: an accent's brightness varies by theme and
  this band is type, hairlines and other people's logos.
- **Every rule.** The rail is drawn in `currentColor`, so it is the same colour
  as the text beside it in whatever colour your theme sets, cannot resolve to
  nothing, and follows the band if you invert it.
- **Typeface.** The pattern states no font family. The claim takes your theme's
  face, which is the thing worth looking at first: a display serif and a
  grotesque want slightly different tracking at this size.
- **Spacing scale.** The band's padding and the gaps between the three parts of
  the argument use the core spacing presets.

## What it decides for itself

- **62 / 38.** The argument takes the wide side and the marks the narrow one,
  which is the ratio that lets the claim break into two or three lines while the
  rail stays narrow enough to read as a column rather than as a second panel.
- **A held measure.** The proof paragraph and its footnote sit in a nested
  constrained group at `34rem`, not the full 62% column, so the reading line
  stays around 65 characters. The claim is deliberately not held: a display line
  wants the whole column.
- **The type ramp.** Eyebrow and footnote at `clamp(0.875rem, 1vw, 0.9375rem)`,
  the reading paragraph at `clamp(max(1rem, 16px), 1.15vw, 1.1875rem)` at 1.6
  line-height, the claim at `clamp(2.125rem, 4.2vw, 3.375rem)` at 1.05 with
  negative tracking.
- **Four marks, one per row.** Four is what balances a three-line claim plus a
  four-line paragraph. It is a column, not a grid: a second mark per row turns
  the rail back into the table that `logo-cells` already is.

## What you change first

1. **The claim.** It is the pattern. Make it a sentence somebody could disagree
   with; a claim that says "trusted by leading brands" gives the rail nothing to
   be evidence for.
2. **The proof paragraph.** Put a number in it. The paragraph is the only place
   in the logos section where a specific fact fits, which is the whole reason
   this pattern exists.
3. **The images.** Click each cell and choose your file. Use SVG or a
   transparent PNG; a logo on its own white rectangle will show that rectangle
   against your band, and no setting here can fix it.
4. **The count.** Four `core/group` cells in the rail. Add a fifth by
   duplicating one, and give it the same top hairline the others have; the
   first cell is the only one without, because the rail's own top border draws
   that line. Beyond six the rail outgrows the argument and you want
   `logo-cells` instead.
5. **The labels.** "Why they come back" and "The evidence" head the two halves.
   Delete both for a plainer band; delete only one and the row loses its
   alignment at the top.

## At 390

Below 782px WordPress stacks the two columns, so the argument reads first and
the rail follows it full width. The marks are still contained in fixed cells, so
they get wider and stay the same height, which is the correct behaviour for a
logo and the reason the cells are not set as a proportion.

## The variation

**Masthead** takes the claim out of its column and runs it across a `46rem`
measure at the top of the band, then puts the rail and the proof paragraph in
the row beneath it, marks on the left. The base makes the marks the counterweight
to the headline; the masthead makes the headline the title of the whole band and
sets the marks level with the reading, so the section opens louder and argues
more quietly. Same palette, same promise, different structure.

## The Styled look

`olive-and-mustard` turns the band into "As featured in" for a restaurant or
a venue. It states deep olive `#2f3321`, cream `#f1e8d2` type and rules, and
mustard `#e0b44a` (6.7:1 on the olive) for the eyebrow, the heavy top rule of
the rail and the line under each title. The rail holds four fictional
publication titles set as type, each in its own treatment of the two stacks
(italic, tracked capitals, bold, spaced capitals), so there are no logo files
to source. The claim is an italic Didot stack (Bodoni MT, then Georgia) over Helvetica. The ruled rail
is still the only ruled thing on the band.

## Contrast

Everything readable in the band is your `contrast` on your `base`, the highest
contrast pair every stock block theme guarantees. The eyebrows, the footnote and
the paragraph are small text held to the 4.5:1 body threshold; the claim is
genuinely large text, above 34px at every width, so it would pass at 3:1, but it
is on the same pair and is measured at the body threshold anyway. The rail is
`currentColor`, so it carries the text's own ratio. No type sits on an image
anywhere: the cells hold marks and nothing else.

## Included images

The copied markup includes demonstration brand logos. The public image URLs
keep the examples visible after pasting. Select an image or cover and choose
**Replace** to use your own Media Library files. See [image credits](/image-credits/)
for the sources and licenses. Pasting an image URL does not import a Media Library
attachment.
